Comments for Double Standards: Multiple Sex Partners at http://www.urbansteez.com , comment 0 to 6 out of 6 comments http://www.urbansteez.com Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:57:25 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.urbansteez.com/brittani_williams_column/double_standards_multiple_sex_partners.php#pc_804 The woman is a threshold through which any man will walk. - matty b Fri, 16 May 2008 20:25:07 +0100 http://www.urbansteez.com/brittani_williams_column/double_standards_multiple_sex_partners.php#pc_797 These relationships that are being referenced are at the bottom of the totem pole of human expression. The actions and motives of the parties involved center around control and neediness.and dependency. more closer to addiction than "relating". men are worst than whores...men are the cowards that wont represent true intentions. Every man that is so against his wife cheating on him is more than willing to sniff behind the still dripping behind of a married or committed woman.They will use the excuse that this chick was being abused and neglected so they had to play Captain save a Ho. Men do not want to "share" when asked about it on an intellectual basis, but will be the "other" man any time an attractive woman opens herself to being available. If our sex lives today was based on the fun, beauty and freedom of expression that sharing is meant to be, all this anger, violence and revenge wouldnt even come into game play. every body is sharing energy with or without eachothers permission. sometimes a coworker who is not getting the physical penetration of sex is getting more "intimacy" from the committed person already in an active relationship at home. I have counseled many Jump-off scenarios and one thing you can take to the bank...its always about control issues. Sexual magnetism is inherit in every strong Leader through out our history. Men and women who will lead millions will also seduce millions. Obama and clinton are sex objects...period. The world is masturbating with them both. A man wants most what we are told we cannot have. creating a "marriage" also begins the composition of a break-out strategy starting with the...bachelors party...who's fooling who? - Dream Maker Thu, 15 May 2008 13:17:44 +0100 http://www.urbansteez.com/brittani_williams_column/double_standards_multiple_sex_partners.php#pc_571 Well it's one thing to have live a promiscuous sexual life, but it's another to have multiple unprotected sexual encounters. Obviously unprotected sex can lead to pregnancy, which tends to lead to a single mother without father, and it can also lead to many STDs, one of which can be the deadly HIV virus. Still, HIV is considered rare amongst heterosexual's, the risk is rare and it's less than 1 in 1000 unprotected sexual encounters. But the risk is much greater for gay males who participate in promiscuous sex. So the answer to all of these risk is engaing in protected sex. Now the only thing involved now is your emotions, rather than your physical health. It's nearly impossible to turn down sex when you're dating, even if it's for a short period of time. When you're in the moment, your mind does not reflect on any negativity of future consequences. Majority of them time it's the female that gets screwed over, no pun attended. Us guys can be dogs, but we respect a woman who is willing to hold out. If a guy is not willing to hold out, 99 percent of them he just wanted to have sex with no strings attached. Woman should be able to read that, if not, it's not our fault you feel for the trap. - RubinSparx Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:27:19 +0100 http://www.urbansteez.com/brittani_williams_column/double_standards_multiple_sex_partners.php#pc_381 well coming from a males poin of veiw...........we do not call the women whores. okay that is a cliche' that the world has formed and labled it. it gets deeper.......... its only by the ppl. who told me or u that it was okay for men and not for women, and the ppl. who told them etc..... u get me? i think its more of an addiction that ppl. dont know they have . its serious and ppl. need to talk about it....i suffer from it myself....i think that some ppl. are comfortable with multiple sex partners, others cant stomach not being involved sexually with someone unless love is there....sometimes the curtain should be pulled and ppl. do and say whats on their mind. who are we to say right and wrong.... i'm not saying screw tom and dick and harry but .... noone should be faced with having to not do something they may want to do , in fear of what the world may think......keep it on the up and up.dueces!!!!!govmuscle ICE CITY GEORIGA - govnuscle Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:40:23 +0100 http://www.urbansteez.com/brittani_williams_column/double_standards_multiple_sex_partners.php#pc_351 WELL BRITT...I HAVE TO AGREE WITH AMEER (WELL PUT BROTHER!!!) WHILE DOUBLE STANDARDS MAY NOT BE RIGHT..IT IS WHAT IT IS..IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN THAT WAY..AND IT WILL ALWAYS BE THAT WAY..BUT THE WORST THING A WOMAN CAN DO IS SAY..IF MEN CAN ACT THIS WAY..THEN SO CAN I..WRONG MOVE..AS SAD AS IT IS TO SAY..ON SOME PLATFORMS WOMEN WILL NEVER BE ON THE SAME LEVEL AS MEN..HEY I DIDN'T WRITE THE RULE..SOMEBODY BACK IN TEH CAVE MAN TIMES CHISLED IT ON A WALL AND THAT'S JUST HOW IT HAS BEEN..SORRY MA! BRING YOUR "A" GAME TO THE SHOW THURSDAY BECAUSE THERE IS PLENTY MORE WHERE THIS IS COMING FROM! - SEAN Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:47:15 +0100 http://www.urbansteez.com/brittani_williams_column/double_standards_multiple_sex_partners.php#pc_290 Here is my take on the issue... Men have to be allowed to go further by the women, the women has to be willing to open her legs. Women lose value when having multiple partners while men gain value in most cases. Because MEN are naturally the hunters that prey on women... Its like when we hunt, the chase is what makes it interesting, catching a women that is exclusive and rare is the ultimate prize. Meanwhile while trying to hunt , there is deer ( women) that just lay down in front of us wanting to be takin and we take and keep moving.. Any women that thinks its okay to think like a man on a sex level.... is NO GOOD!!! PERIOD...Lol... Seriously, women have to maintain their value!! As far with friends with benefits... Its an understanding that has to be established, a understanding of respect! I have been in a friends with benefits situation where I wasn't in love with her but I had the most respect for her and she had the same for me. I personally do not see a benefit in meaningless sex... it had never been satisfying for me! But a friend with benefits is a safe bet when both mates have respect for each other. Best thing to do in a situation of friends with benefits is KEEP IT REAL!! and I'm honest to a fault.... ;D ;D RESPECT is the key!!! - Ameer Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:28:50 +0100